|
|
|
Self
Revealed: A 30-Year Retrospective
Sarah Spurgeon Gallery
Central Washington University
Ellensburg, WA
Essay by Janet Marstine, for Jane Orleman
January , 2000
Click
images for details
Both witty and haunting, brash and sophisticated, the oeuvre
of CWU alumnus Jane Orleman transcends the genre of psychobiography
to engage the wider field of feminist art practice. A survivor
of childhood incest, rape, and physical abuse, Orleman foregrounds
her personal bodily experience as subject. She creates multi-layered
imagery, informed by feminist interpretations of Jungian theory,
that explores the nature of domesticity and the potential of
metamorphosis. This imagery, while therapeutic and diaristic,
ultimately asserts a larger agenda. Orleman translates private
trauma into the public discourse of gender politics by suggesting
confluences between familial and cultural patriarchy. |
 |
|
|
|
|
Over
the last thirty years, feminism has played a catalytic role
in redefining the art world. Orleman's work is representative
of the deep psychological transformation in which women artists
have made public women's experience, museums have been challenged
to prioritize diversity over canon, and the icon of the artist
as heroic male figure has begun to lose its grip on the popular
imagination. A sophisticated support system of university museums,
women's studies departments, alternative exhibition spaces,
and community art galleries has developed to spotlight the work
of women artists; such efforts have buoyed Orleman's career.
Nonetheless, Orleman and her feminist colleagues remain troubled
by censorship. Orleman's shows have been picketed, her exhibition
announcements have mysteriously disappeared, and she has repeatedly
been called to justify her work, not to legal authorities, but
to jittery committees and organizations acting as if they were
the law or were in fear of the law. In fact, the obscenity in
Orleman's work rests with the act of child abuse perpetrated
against her, not with her resulting imagery. Indeed, furor over
Orleman's art indicates that the ultimate taboo is for women
to take possession of their own sexuality within the public
forum of visual media.
Orleman's early works of 1969-78 defy the long-held ideal of
the woman artist as amateur: model, lover, student, muse, and
patron to her male colleagues. Like Judy Chicago, Faith Ringgold,
and a host of other women artists of that generation, Orleman
uses imagery associated with the domestic to subvert traditional
notions of the feminine. Through shadowboxes and paintings depicting
quiet, intimate interiors, Orleman articulates an autonomous
artistic identity based on her search for safety in the home.
Her doll house-like space establishes an inner sanctum of harmony
and order unlike that of her own childhood. A maze of illusion
in windows, doors, mirrors, and paintings within paintings intimates,
however, that a game of hide and seek lies within the fiction.
And as Orleman adds figures, the home becomes box as container,
as the female body; experimentation with sexually loaded iconography
such as a bed, a bathtub, and a strategically placed candle
by the crotch of a male sitter propel Orleman to examine her
sexuality more directly.
Next Page | Back
to top |

 |
|
|
|
|